Status
Call number
Collection
Subjects
Description
"A leading geneticist explores what promises to be one of the most transformative advances in health and medicine in history. Almost every week, another exciting headline appears about new advances in the field of genetics. Genetic testing is experiencing the exponential growth once seen with the Internet, and the plummeting cost of DNA sequencing makes it increasingly accessible for individuals and families. Dr. Steven M. Lipkin suggests that today's genomics is like the last century's nuclear physics: a powerful tool for good if used correctly, but potentially dangerous in the wrong hands. DNA testing is promising in treating serious disease, but Beijing Genomics, one of the world's largest genomics centers, is quietly developing gene tests to predict intelligence and athletic prowess in prenatal embryo selection. DNA testing could also lead to unnecessary procedures and significantly higher health-care costs. And all too often, sequencing errors diagnose patients with debilitating and fatal genetic diseases.The Genome Generation immerses readers in stories of real patients on the genomics frontier and explores the transformative potential and dangerous risks of genetic technology. It will inform anxious parents increasingly bombarded by offers of costly new prenatal testing products, and demonstrate how genetic technology, when deployed properly, can prevent or treat genetic disorders such as neurological diseases or cancer. Lipkin explains the science in depth, but in terms a layperson can follow"--… (more)
Similar in this library
Library's review
The good news: the book is easy reading and engaging, in my opinion. The bad news: the book could do better on references to scholarly sources. On pages 104 & 105, he compares connective tissues to a smart home/intranet of things, sending signals to the blood and immune systems and retarding the growth of cancer cells. I have done immense amounts of study on connective tissues and had never seen any reference to this, so I was dubious. Not a single footnote to back up this claim, so I got on PubMed and found out that 1 solitary researcher has published a *hypothesis* that this might be the case and called for further research...this is not even a solid theory yet, let alone settled fact. See PMID 16483726. I believe this hypothesis has a decent chance of being true, but at least be intellectually honest and admit it's a hypothesis.
I wish that the book gave a better, more complete explanation of imprinting and mosaicism and other complicated concepts--it's overly simplified. Epigenetics is explained well, however.
Some of the issues discussed in the book are precision medicine, inequality in coverage of testing and treatment for genetic diseases, genetic criminal forensics and the pitfalls thereof, epigenetics, eugenics, genetic discrimination, cut-rate genetic sequencing vs more expensive, higher quality sequencing, whole-exome sequencing in healthy people, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, and whole genome sequencing of newborns. These issues were explained well along with their controversial aspects.
About half of the genetic defects discussed in the book are familial cancer syndromes, but I was pleasantly surprised to find Loeys-Dietz Syndrome mentioned. It is a rather new disease to be described in the medical journals and I remember when Dr. Dietz was looking for additional patients in order to have more than a handful of patients in his case reports.
My biggest beef with the author is his statement that his patient who came to him saying that he had 3 rare, unrelated genetic disorders has Munchausen Syndrome. Doctors who aren't psychiatrists have absolutely no business diagnosing Munchausen Syndrome. Earlier in the book, he ridicules the idea of idiopathic disease--well, the vast majority of diagnoses of Munchausen Syndrome by non-psychiatrists are every bit as intellectually lazy as idiopathic diagnoses. If you have non-specific symptoms that can't be backed up with laboratory findings, the majority of non-psychiatrist practitioners believe that those symptoms are imaginary and pull out the Munchausen/somatization diagnosis. Pain, vertigo, near-syncope, itching, blurred vision, tinnitus, fatigue, paresthesias, and many more symptoms cannot be verified clinically, but they do exist. When you hear hoofbeats, think horses (unless you are in a zoo), but remember that zebras do exist. I would challenge Dr. Lipkin with a case study of an individual with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Conn Syndrome, and severe JAK2-negative polycythemia--all completely and vastly different disorders and should never occur in the same patient, correct? False, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome is the hint that there is something else going on: Mast Cell Activation Syndrome--yes, a fourth diagnosis, but MCAS can cause both endocrine tumors and polycythemia, and is very, very closely associated with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. The motto is "If you can't connect the issues, think connective tissues!"
In short, this is no scholarly tome and the author/coauthor/editor isn't always "sciencing" correctly, but it was an interesting read. I won't recommend it to any of my friends because of the overly simplistic or inaccurate explanations of scientific principles, but it is a decent overview of ethical debates regarding genetics in the entertaining form of a memoir.
User reviews
Don't take that wrong. I don't want cancer killing people. But this book talks both about diseases (most especially cancer) and those who have them. And, frankly, the disease parts are a lot more interesting.
That may be a minority
Also, while it is clear that author Lipkin knows a lot about genetics, I'm not so confident about other areas. At least, in the one area I know -- autism -- he's clearly not very expert. For example, he claims that autism is more common in boys than girls -- and seems to be subtly hinting that boy children of families with autistic members should abort their boy children. Apart from the fact that autism isn't such a bad thing (would you have aborted Isaac Newton, Dr. Lipkin? How about Thomas Jefferson? They both showed clear signs of autism), the fact is not that boys are more likely to have autism, not that they are more likely to be diagnosed with autism -- a self-fulfilling prophecy: if only boys have autism, then only boys will be diagnosed with it! The overwhelming trend of recent research is that girls are much better at hiding their autism, so while it's likely that nearly as many girls as boys have autism, they haven't been diagnosed.
That's one nitpick. It's not fair to judge a book on one nitpick. But it really does seem to me that this book falls between the stools of "good science" and "personal interest" -- but closer to "personal interest." And that isn't a book I want, and I doubt it's a book we need.
everyone read it for its insights as to the present status of research in Genetics.
But the remaining chapters are too specifically tied to specific individuals, such that it does not appear to be of much use to the general
I found this to be a
Some of the scientific discussions about DNA discovery and exploration were written for the so everyone can understand and not just molecular biologists, physicians or geneticist. Being able to read and understand the information was wonderful. That said, there are references to aspects of DNA that will take need a sophisticated knowledge of the science to understand.
I would recommend this book to others interested in a DNA. Even some doctors would benefit from a deeper understanding of DNA and medicine, this book might be a good place to start.
I received this advance copy through Library Thing, from the publisher Beacon Press.
6/21/16