Status
Call number
Genres
Publication
Description
Fiction. Literature. HTML: Read the "rollickingly good literary thriller" and New York Times bestseller that's the inspiration for the HBO limited series The Undoing, premiering October 25 and starring Nicole Kidman and Hugh Grant (Vanity Fair). Grace Reinhart Sachs is living the only life she ever wanted for herself. Devoted to her husband, a pediatric oncologist at a major cancer hospital, their young son Henry, and the patients she sees in her therapy practice, her days are full of familiar things: she lives in the very New York apartment in which she was raised, and sends Henry to the school she herself once attended. Dismayed by the ways in which women delude themselves, Grace is also the author of a book You Should Have Known, in which she cautions women to really hear what men are trying to tell them. But weeks before the book is published a chasm opens in her own life: a violent death, a missing husband, and, in the place of a man Grace thought she knew, only an ongoing chain of terrible revelations. Left behind in the wake of a spreading and very public disaster, and horrified by the ways in which she has failed to heed her own advice, Grace must dismantle one life and create another for her child and herself..… (more)
User reviews
Since Grace is a therapist, there's a lot of self-analysis of her previous and subsequent actions. Fortunately, this was not as boring as it might have been, or I never would have gotten through this 400+ page book. Since the book was a selection of my local book club, I might not have read it otherwise.
© Amanda Pape - 2016
[This book was borrowed from and returned to my local public library.]
From the book blurb and a general knowledge of how psychological thrillers work, we quickly realize that Grace's marriage is NOT as blissful as she believes, and that she's built her life around years worth of lies, deceptions, and ignorance. The fun part of the book is figuring out just how twisted her marriage actually is.
I won't lie. I hated Grace from the first chapter. I hated her smug, patronizing tone with her clients, her obvious self-deception, and her shallow lifestyle. But I couldn't stop reading. In fact, I kept reading with my own sense of smug self-satisfaction, knowing that I wasn't like HER. I would never make the mistakes that SHE'S made. I would never behave like THAT. And I think that's partially why psychological thrillers are so addicting. We can read about other peoples' mistakes and enjoy a detached ego boost in the process. The more things go wrong, the more we can sit back with a smile and enjoy the fact that our lives, at least, haven't turned out THAT poorly.
The other addicting aspect of psychological thrillers are the plot twists, and boy, there are a ton of them in here. But as is the case with all good twists, they arise organically from the plot without feeling like the author just spun a magic "plot twist" wheel to keep the story going.
And for readers who were upset with the lack of redemption and/or closure at the end of Gone Girl, you might enjoy this ending better. Obviously, I won't give away specifics, but let's just say that Grace does not remain unlikeable for the entire story. It takes her awhile to get to that point, but she does get there.
There isn't much to make this book truly stand out from the rest of the new psychological thrillers, but it's still extremely gripping and entertaining. Good option for fans of Gone Girl looking for something new.
Readalikes:
Psychological suspense featuring unlikeable main characters:
Gone Girl - Gillian Flynn
Dark Places - Gillian Flynn
The Dinner - Herman Koch
The Silent Wife - A.S.A. Harrison
Psychological suspense featuring female protagonists & written by female authors:
Sharp Objects - Gillian Flynn
Mother, Mother - Koren Zailckas
The Never List - Koethi Zan
Or, if you're interested in some of the new psychological thrillers being published, try:
The Apple Tree Yard - Louise Doughty
The Innocent Sleep - Karen Perry
Watching You - Michael Robotham
Grace discusses the role of the therapist. In her case, she helps people try to recognize their current situation, discover what signs they missed, and develop ways to move on. She points out that an vital part of a conversation is behavior and tones of both the speaker and listener. With so much communication today conducted via the internet, those elements are missing.
After looking at the selection of books covering dating and marriage, she did not find any looking at that aspect of dating and selecting a spouse so she wrote one. The book was ready to be released within a few weeks and magazines, newspapers, and talk shows are all lining up to interview her.
On a personal level, her husband of nineteen years, Jonathan, an pediatric oncologist at a highly rated hospital, had been named one of the best doctors in his field. Citing a very disturbing childhood, he has no relationship with his birth family. Their twelve-year-old son, Henry, attended the same exclusive private school that she had attended.
As YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN opens, Grace was attending a committee meeting for a fund raiser for the school. It was very obvious that the other mothers are a group of snobs who look down on everyone who is not of their class. Even Grace doesn’t meet their standards. When the mother of a scholarship student shows up late, the atmosphere gets even more chilly as she partially disrobes to nurse her infant daughter.
A few days later, the day after the successful fundraiser, the mother of one of the students is brutally murdered. Jonathan disappears and suddenly Grace realizes that she actually knows very little about who he really was.
YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN might have been a five-star 250-page novel. It raises interesting points about interpersonal relationships. Unfortunately, it rambles on for almost two hundred more pages. Jean Hanff Korelitz provides too many unnecessary details which distract from the story rather than enrich it. She repeats some descriptions excessively: Jonathan has curly dark hair. One of the police officers has a fat neck. The repair of the tooth that Jonathan had chipped was a slightly different color from the adjacent. After the murder, she wrote about the mothers delivering and picking up their children from school three times, twice noting the responsibility was too important to send a surrogate, usually a nanny, to do so. Once, twice at the most, would have been enough.
In one place she abruptly changes the location. She wrote about how Jonathan was always there for his patients. In one place she pictures him paying a condolence call after the funeral of one of his patients “a square of torn fabric pinned to his coat.” Only the immediate family would wear the torn fabric and he was not a family member.
The second last chapter has some important elements but is essentially a rehash of her life.
Jean Hanff Korelitz is a gifted author who writes for a literate reader. She needs a much better editor.
"You Should Have Known" centers around Grace Sachs, a marriage counselor and therapist living in New York with her husband, pediatric oncologist Jonathan Sachs, and their son Henry. Grace has authored a soon-to-be-published book titled 'You Should Have Known', a self-help of sorts which lambasts women for making terrible choices in companions and spouses when they should have read the tell-tale signs of a doomed relationship from the start. Henry is enrolled at Rearden, a private school catering to the upper-class families of Manhattan, following his mother's footsteps.
Grace's confidence in her expertise on relationships and in her steadfast and loving marriage is shaken and turned upside down when a Rearden student's mother is brutally murdered and Jonathan becomes the primary suspect. In a flurry of humiliation and confusion, the truth about numerous affairs, illegitimate children, and termination of his employment months prior is revealed, leaving Grace devastated and in shock. Everything she thought was true is put to the question. She and Henry quickly depart Manhattan and its inevitable media circus and eventually attempt to start a new life at her lakehouse in Connecticut.
Korelitz is masterful at building suspense. I felt my heart thumping as more and more information was released, felt the frantic helplessness of Grace as she tried desperately to find Jonathan when he disappeared, and gasped when the ropes holding together her life became unraveled string by string. I wanted to reach through the pages and shake her by the shoulders a few times, when 'a-ha moments' would strike me and things fell into place to expose truths before Grace figured them out, or when she purposely and stubbornly fell into denial and refused to see those truths for herself.
The only criticism I have of the book is the romance that Korelitz begins to develop between Grace and her lakehouse neighbor. It starts only a couple months after Grace's world as she knew it came crashing down, and seemed a bit too cavalier and rushed to be believable. A woman who finds out in December that her husband is not only an adulterer but a murderer as well, is not likely to be falling for and kissing another man in late February. I feel as though that part was an attempt by Korelitz to signal that Grace was moving on with her life and would overcome all that had happened, but I believe the book would have been better off without the blooming lovestory at the end.
All in all, this is a solid book. It has a compelling plot and well-developed characters, but is too intense for what I would consider a summer read. Read it when you desire something with more substance, and I'm sure you won't be disappointed.
Family therapist Grace Sachs has it all: a successful career, a talented son, a husband at the pinnacle of his medical career, and even her first book set for publication entitled You Should Have Known. Interviews, television appearances - it seems everyone is fascinated by Grace’s unique take on marriage counseling. As Grace declares, no one should be surprised when your marriage disintegrates. After all, the signs were all there before you chose to marry. If you chose to ignore them, it was at your own peril. A cheating spouse? A wife with a gambling addiction? An alcoholic, abusive husband? The signs were all there….you should have known.
Grace’s theories, however, soon get put to the test when her own husband’s secrets are publicly - oh how publicly! - revealed, decimating Grace’s marriage, her career, and her public persona. The question quickly becomes: Should Grace have known?
Korelitz walks a fine line throughout the novel with Grace. It is a generally accepted axiom that a protagonist, regardless of faults, should still be sympathetic to the reader. Grace’s hubris makes this a difficult task at times and while Korelitz tries to offset this by elevating her husband’s crimes beyond any and all acceptable lines, she doesn’t always succeed. The narrative is provided by Grace, giving ample opportunity for long introspective monologues throughout the story. Grace’s general refusal to contemplate her own behavior that enabled her husband to commit such an atrocity starts to wear thin after the first 200 pages.
Throughout most of the novel, Grace seems nothing more than a passive, bewildered observer to her own crisis. If the novel took place over the course of a few days this particular trait might be more understandable - ergo, sympathetic - to the reader. Instead, as the weeks and months pass, it verges on the cusp of annoying. Grace simply allows events to happen to her with little reaction aside from perpetually stunned.
Her husband’s crimes - a thread of the story that promises rapt reader attention - become of less and less importance and ultimately find no resolution by the end. This loose end may well have been a deliberate tactic by Korelitz to indicate the relative unimportance his actions - the novel is, after all, about Grace and her self-discovery - but ends up feeling like an untidy detail forgotten in the need to wrap the story up.
For the reader who can overlook this or find some overriding sympathetic qualities in Grace, the story does have many redeeming qualities. Korelitz excels creating the upper-middle-class, New York City environment that encloses Grace and her family. The continual one upmanship that exists amongst New York mothers jockeying for the best private schools, tutors, and exclusive activities for their children is a thought-provoking indictment of societal values. Put another way: Manhattanites take PTA politics to an entirely new level.
Woven in with this is the theme of friendship and the superficiality of many everyday relationships. Grace’s tendency to keep herself at arms-length from those outside her own nuclear family. Ultimately, she suffers from this decision and finds herself with no support system and a son she thinks she is protecting from the real world.
Although the plot of You Should Have Known is compelling enough to keep turning the pages, weak resolutions and questions about Grace’s character linger for me. Whether you experience sympathy or frustration will likely depend on your own judgement of Grace - an irony considering judgment of others is one of Grace’s great flaws.
What do we know about the characters in this book? Grace Sachs is a therapist who specializes in marriage counseling. Her husband, Jonathan, is a devoted pediatric oncologist. She loves the life they have together and totally believes in the sacrifices his work requires him to make. They live in New York City with their only child, in the same apartment that she grew up in, and their son Henry, who is 12 years old, goes to the same tony private school that she attended as a child. Henry is very well behaved and very likeable; he plays the violin and might be a little bit of a geek. The family lives in its own bubble and is basically self sufficient, needing very little interaction with others; they are isolated from all but some immediate family members. There are secrets lurking here that will explode to the surface as the book reveals their story.
This book seems to be another in that popular genre of today, with characters stereotyped as spoiled rich women with children in an exclusive school. The woman are depicted as shallow and petty, blind to their own foibles, too vain and materialistic, too hedonistic, too quick to criticize and judge others and not themselves. They see themselves and the world through their own rose colored glasses and they are not particularly loyal to anyone. Most of the men are portrayed as governed, not by their brains but rather by their gender and sex.
Grace Sachs has recently written a book, bearing the same name as the title of this book, “You Should Have Known”, which details the reasons married couples should have realized they were making a mistake before taking that fateful step down the aisle. Almost immediately, she writes, one of the spouses reveals to the other exactly who they are and what they will be like, but for some reason, she believes they choose to misremember what happened in their initial meeting. They create a fairytale scene around it, only remembering hints about the problems to come, when a crisis erupts. She believes that women more than men, know when they marry, that the partner they have chosen is wrong for them, but they put on blinders. In her arrogance, has Grace’s own eyesight failed?
Grace is a member of the Fundraising Committee at Henry’s school. At the last meeting, before their major fundraising event takes place, she meets Malaga Alves, a new committee member. Her son, Miguel, attends the school as a scholarship student. In the days to come, Malaga will unexpectedly have a major impact on Grace’s life, turning it completely upside down and forcing her to face very difficult questions she may not be able to answer.
As a couple, seemingly by choice, Grace and Jonathan have few friends. They are preoccupied with their work and raising their son. They live together, but also separately in their own worlds, not interfering with each other’s domain, rarely questioning each other’s activities. When a crisis arises, Grace discovers that she has been irresponsible about the relationships in her own life, failing to see what she would have seen as a therapist dealing with strangers. When it counted most, she was distracted. Now that she was facing her own very traumatic situation, she seemed too weak to deal with it maturely. I found her reactions awkward and difficult to understand. Every time she was faced with a new problem, or with uncomfortable, previously unknown information, she got weak-kneed and threw up! It was not very professional behavior, and I kept thinking, perhaps she needed to hire her own therapist!
Even after her world explodes around her, and she becomes involved in a murder investigation, she doesn’t face things head on, but skirts around the issues, avoiding them. She takes to her bed like an ostrich with her head in the sand, pretending that all will be well. I found her behavior inappropriate and not very credible.
I found the first 100 pages slow to get into, but then the story picked up and held my interest. There are some issues that would lend themselves to group discussions, and for that reason, it is a good read for book clubs. The major hump to get over when reading the book is that a trained therapist never questioned or saw what was happening in front of her eyes for 18 years. She just seemed too naïve, considering her chosen profession, to have constantly made excuses for the odd circumstances of her life, without looking any further than the excuses provided by her husband. Was she really living in such a controlled environment, and was she really in such control of her own emotions that she never questioned any change in her friendships or lifestyles, other than to say, ho hum, oh well? Also, in the end, the author worked out her life a bit too comfortably. It was almost a fairy tale. Long lost relatives appeared and welcomed them into their lives after two decades. She has found a male companion and Henry finds his new school to be utopia for him. Henry is just too perfect, also. He is like the adult in the room, rather than Grace.
I found the conclusion of the book unsatisfying with questions that remained unanswered. Does Henry go on to have a successful life? How does Miguel fare with his father? Does Grace remarry? Is Jonathan caught and convicted? Does Elena ever get to meet Miguel, her half brother? Is the ending even plausible? I think the book could probably have been shorter, but it is a quick read and will hold your interest while on vacation or commuting to work. The book is a suspenseful mystery, but it won’t tax your brain trying to figure it out. The looming question at the end will be, is the plot credible?
I read this in one sitting more or less and enjoyed the beginning (the committee meeting where Malaga breastfeeds her baby was great) and ending (where Grace meets Jonathan's parents and reunites with Vita etc) very much. The middle dragged a lot and I had a hard time relating to Grace's seeming insistence on keeping her head in the sand. I would have been going through that Blackberry right away. I could have done with a few more examples of Grace revisiting episodes from her marriage and realizing what really went on. She almost seemed to hold that she couldn't have seen it coming sometimes. There was a fair bit of repetition here and long passages of pondering that could have been edited out to keep things moving along. I loved the kicker right at the end that Jonathan wasn't in the Yukon after all.
I do seem to be reading a lot of books lately about how it is impossible to live in New York on the salaries of two professionals. Can this really be true? Grace's viewpoint about relationships made it hard for me to imagine how she could come up with anything helpful to say to her clients. Two months or so after discovering your husband is a murdering psychopath seems to me a bit soon to be embarking on a new relationship, but I daresay Vita will be keeping an eye on that. I liked the way Grace also came to re-evaluate her father and Eva and her father's marriage to her mother. I kept expecting to learn that the reason Jonah's parents' marriage failed and Jonah no longer wanted to be Henry's friend was something to do with Jonathan too.
I thank the publisher, author, and NetGalley for the opportunity to read and review this book. I love books that make me think, and "You Should Have Known" delivered masterfully.
Although somewhat farfetched, I enjoyed this psychological drama, which suggests that one can never fully predict the choices that others will make. I loved the irony regarding Grace's book and how she "should have known" that her husband was not honest with her in their marriage. However, it seemed unlikely that the couple could be married for 18 years and that Grace was described as a particularly insightful therapist, but was unable to catch her husband in any lies in that time. This would make a great book club book since it could lead to good discussions about if bad relationships can be predicted or prevented and the role that denial plays in our close relationships with others.
Since