Status
Call number
Series
Collection
Publication
Description
Fiction. Suspense. Thriller. Historical Fiction. HTML:Benjamin Weaver, the quick-witted pugilist turned private investigator, returns in David Liss�s sequel to the Edgar Award�winning novel, A Conspiracy of Paper. �[A] wonderful book . . . every bit as good as [Liss�s] remarkable debut . . . easily one of the year�s best.��The Boston Globe Moments after his conviction for a murder he did not commit, at a trial presided over by a judge determined to find him guilty, Benjamin Weaver is accosted by a stranger who cunningly slips a lockpick and a file into his hands. In an instant he understands two things: Someone wants him to hang�and another equally mysterious agent is determined to see him free. After a daring escape from eighteenth-century London�s most notorious prison, Weaver must face another challenge: to prove himself innocent when the corrupt courts have shown they care nothing for justice. Unable to show his face in public, Weaver pursues his inquiry disguised as a wealthy merchant seeking to involve himself in the contentious world of politics. Desperately navigating a labyrinth of schemers, crime lords, assassins, and spies, Weaver learns that in an election year, little is what it seems and the truth comes at a staggeringly high cost. Praise for A Spectacle of Corruption �[A] rousing sequel of historical, intellectual suspense. ��San Antonio Express-News �Liss is a superb writer who evokes the squalor of London with Hogarthian gusto.��People �In Benjamin Weaver, Mr. Liss has created a multifaceted character and a wonderful narrator.��The New York Sun.… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
These ingredients make a rich story and a deep one. We have the background of the first parliamentary election under George I and a thorough discussion of Whigs, Tories and Jacobites. These all work to provide smoke to the mystery. Why is our hero on trial for the murder of a man he didn't kill. He is no saint, he has killed before, but not this man? Why does his adversary stand a character witness for him? Why does the judge not give him a voice during the trial?
These questions answered, one could proceed in a straight path to find the motive and the powerful figures behind the accusations. But while taking such a path, our hero finds that the path isn't straight, and it is also cluttered.
We see up close the underside of London in the early 18th century, and a feel for its politics. Corruption is at the heart of all, there being no good men to be found who want to do better for their fellow men without some flaw or other.
My gripe with this book, and the first has to do with the research the author has done on dance. He makes the case look as if couples could go to the dance floor for a private conversation. Not so. It would be a country dance where all your neighbors would hear your talk, or a minuet and then you would be on display. The description we have leads one to think of a couple held close n a waltz. Not so at the period.
So I do recommend it. It has a lot to offer. Better than many another historical mystery, thought not as good as Coffee Trader or Conspiracy of Paper.
I'm hard-pressed to say whether I liked this one or Conspiracy better - I think just for the excellent coverage of political intrigue this one has the edge. Both, however, make for excellent reading (as does their companion, The Coffee Trader, which I reviewed here). Recommended.
What a great
I have since read two more books by David Liss and thoroughly enjoyed both. In case you hadn't already figured it out, I highly recommend this book.
As a mystery it is good but not great. It has a satisfying premise, which is
I read The Conspiracy of Paper first and still find that Benjamin Weaver is one of my
In general, I knew what to expect from my first two Liss novels (The Coffee Trader & The Wh8isky Rebels); a plot revolving around actual financial/political events and accurate historical detail. I also thought I’d get an engaging, albeit flawed, narrator to bring me through the story and I certainly did.
It was hard, at first, to separate Benjamin Weaver from Ethan Saunders (the hero of The Whiskey Rebels). I don’t know why the two were so tangled in my brain, but eventually Benjamin’s personality solidified and I didn’t have any further thoughts about Ethan Saunders.
Ben’s big flaw is hubris in my opinion. He routinely underestimates his enemies and is taken by surprise when he ought to have known better. He also assumes that his reputation as a brawler will get him out of anything or get anything out of a person. In many cases it does, but I would like to see him become a wiser man. Maybe in the next book he’ll learn not to make so many assumptions.
The plot itself is plausible and follows along a conspiracy of corruption that spans two political parties and the social strata alike. Nothing is really new in the world of politics; power and wealth control all just as fear and greed keep those without the former chasing after them. Votes are bought. Voters are cajoled, threatened, brutalized. Politicians are corrupt and for sale. Politicians are men without attachment to their principals. As I said, nothing’s changed.
The writing was excellent, but I found this one less compelling than The Whiskey Rebels. Maybe because that one was framed with two viewpoints that were slightly skewed in terms of time period. That kept me guessing as to how they’d eventually tie together, and a fresh perspective kept me from letting my attention wander. Not that I was bored with A Spectacle of Corruption; I just wasn’t as compelled as I was with TWR. Maybe it was the American aspect that helped engage me with that one.
The women are drawn with competence, but little depth. I think that’s due to their peripheral nature in this tale though. Miriam/Mary annoyed the hell out of me, while I found myself liking Grace Dogmill and hope we see her again. Ditch Miriam while you can, Ben, she’s no friend to you.
Of course, that's not the main thrust of the book. Weaver, the protagonist of A Conspiracy of Paper, starts the book on trial for killing a porter, and is soon wrongly convicted. The book, then, follows Weaver on his attempts to find out who really did it, and how he can leverage this knowledge into enough influence to get his name cleared.
Like the first book in the series, this one makes use of some mystery techniques - probability, among others - but it justifies them for the time well, and like the first book, most of the characters are engaging and interesting, in a complex and intricate plot that I found quite gripping. It does all get resolved fairly quickly, and there's not much of a denouement; there's also a tendency, I think, to demonize some of the characters more than necessary, but I suppose that would be common enough in the age of books that this is supposed to fit in.
Liss's style is pretty good, getting one involved in Weaver's world and in his head fairly effortlessly, and there's much to be learned, as well. I did very much enjoy this one, and will look forward to reading his next book soon.
"A Spectacle of Corruption" deals with an election that make our political process seem tame by comparision. The title of the book describes the nature of the election -- "A spectacle of corruption" (page 173): "Who has more villains? Whose villains are stronger? Who has prettier girls to kiss the voters?" Citizens of London vote early and vote often. The reader again has the benefit of Liss's meticulous research and thorough knowledge of 18th century London. His use of 18th century-like language -- complete with words that send me to the dictionary -- is readable and evocative. Liss does an excellent job of explaining the poliical complexities of 1722, which I confess I've read about before and never fully understood. Whigs, Tories, and Jacobites all share the stage. A fascinating aspect of the book is the concept of 'misdirection' -- upon which most magin tricks depend -- and the idea of 'hiding in plain sight,' Benajamin Weaver is convicted of murder early in the book, but soon escapes from prison. His sidekick Elias convinces him that he should create a persona and a disguise that are entirely unexpected. "No one is looking for you, so they will not see you. They will see what they expect to see" (page 154). Weaver accepts the arguments and spends the rest of the book in disguise, hiding in plain sight. Thus, he proceeds to solve the mystery of his conviction and, even more astonishing, his escape and the events surrounding the entire situation. The end of the book seemed a little abrupt, but the plot resolution was satisfying and completely unexpected.
One element that I missed from "A Conspiracy of Paper" was a portrayal of Jewish life in 18th century London. This book does not feature Weaver's uncle and one of the Jewish characters from that book has married and become Christian. I'm fascinated by Jewish life, so I'm hoping that Liss explores this world more fully in the next book. We'll see.