Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
Georgette Heyer's sparkling romances have charmed and delighted millions of readers. Her characters brilliantly illuminate one of the most exciting and fascinating eras of English history-when drawing rooms sparkled with well-dressed nobility and romantic intrigues ruled the day. Heyer's heroines are smart and independent; her heroes are dashing noblemen who know how to handle a horse, fight a duel, or address a lady. And her sense of humor is legendary. When the incomparable Miss Milbourne spurns the impetuous Lord Sherington's marriage proposal (she laughs at him-laughs!) he vows to marry the next female he encounters, who happens to be the young, penniless Miss Hero Wantage, who has adored him all her life. Whisking her off to London, Sherry discovers there is no end to the scrapes his young, green bride can get into, and she discovers the excitement and glamorous social scene of the ton. Not until a deep misunderstanding erupts and Sherry almost loses his bride, does he plumb the depths of his own heart, and surprises himself with the love he finds there. 'Reading Georgette Heyer is the next best thing to reading Jane Austen.' -Publishers Weekly Georgette Heyer (1902?1974) wrote over fifty novels, including Regency romances, mysteries, and historical fiction. She was known as the Queen of Regency romance, and was legendary for her research, historical accuracy, and her extraordinary plots and characterizations.… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
Don’t try this at home, boys.
Thankfully, the actual text of Friday’s Child is much more tasteful than the cover of my edition (although typos abound—I’ll need to buy a newer, pristine copy if I choose
At the outset of the story, Lord Anthony “Sherry” Sheringham is in a dire situation. He must either marry or wait until he is twenty-five years old before he may claim his inheritance. Not being the patient sort, and fancying himself in love, he goes to propose to childhood friend and renowned beauty Isabella Milborne (“The Incomparable”). She does not accept him, partially because of some of his more profligate behaviors, partially because she knows he does not love her. Miffed by her refusal and the fake pity afforded by his mother and uncle, he vows to marry the next woman he sees. This turns out to be another childhood friend, Hero Wantage, who has her own reasons for desiring this marriage: first, that if she doesn’t she must become a governess instead; second, that she has always adored Sherry.
The two instantly make there way to London, get married, and settle down. But things do not stay settled for long. Sherry cannot neglect his wife the way he planned to, for having been raised as a dependent relative by a country family, she has no idea of good ton, and so falls into a million scrapes out of which Sherry must rescue her. Meanwhile, he is falling further into the clutches of that notorious gamester, Sir Montagu Revesby. (Is that not the most dastardly name for a villain? I find myself thinking instantly of Vincent Price.) Finally, Sherry’s friends—Gil Ringwood, the honorable Ferdy Frankenham, and Lord George Wrotham—get fed up with his offhand treatment of Hero, and hatch a plan to convince her how very worthy she is of his love.
This is my third Heyer, and I confess that I’m beginning to see the design at work in her fiction. Friday’s Child particularly reminded me of the very first of her novels that I read, Cotillion. Both books feature heroines who have lived all their lives in the country and are brought to London to be introduced into the ton, attend masquerade balls, and be spirited away by their respective unlikely knights whenever they fall unwittingly into social error. But somehow Heyer manipulates the various circumstances and events in such a way that the drama of this story is distinct, memorable, and moving.
And of course, there is one very important way in which Hero and Sherry’s situation differs from Kitty and Freddie’s: they are joined not in a sham engagement, but in a marriage of convenience. I feel that of all the elements in the novel, this central idea is probably the most difficult for modern readers to understand. The notion of an unconsummated marriage is foreign to us. But after a while I just learned to accept it as something that very well might have happened at the time (and shucks, probably does in some places today, too), and I really enjoyed what Heyer did with the situation later on.
On top of all this, it must be admitted that our hero and heroine (or Heyero and Heyeroine, depending on your rank within the Sacred Order of the Society for Regency Fluency) are not what one would call immediately appealing. For all of her high spirits when it comes to certain matters, Hero can at times be too dewy-eyed for my tastes, and more than a bit of a pushover where Sherry is concerned. He, in turn, is dictatorial and insensitive. But they are real people, and both of them develop nicely, Sherry especially. Again, this is a book you need to exercise your patience with—I ended up liking it a great deal more than I thought I would.
To help matters are Sherry’s three friends, who more than make up for any charisma lacking in the leading couple. Gil especially is just the sort of friend any intelligent person wants to have—quiet, unassuming, but never afraid to tell you when you go wrong. George is hilarious in all of his Romantic glory, and Ferdy, of course, gets all the best lines.
All in all, a delightful read.
P.S. To begin with I should’ve said, “don’t try this outside your home.” Devilish business, being stared at on account of one’s reading material! Not quite the thing!
P.P.S. And by “don’t try this,” I mean, of course, “do.” Recommend the book. Fond of it, you know.
Tuesday's child is full of grace,
Wednesday's child is full of woe,
Thursday's child has far to go.
Friday's child is loving and giving,
Saturday's child works hard for a living,
But the child born on the Sabbath Day,
Is fair and wise and good and gay. — Mother Goose
I did
Antony Verelst, the Viscount Sheringham, cannot touch a penny of his fortune until he either gets married or turns 25. After being rejected by the lovely Isabella Milborne (known as "The Incomparable"), Sherry declares that he will marry the next woman he sees. And that woman happens to be young Hero Wantage, the orphaned and penniless playmate of his childhood. They head off to London, procure the requisite special license, and are married with all propriety the day after Sherry's rejection by Isabella. Though Hero is quietly devoted to Sherry and has been since childhood, they agree that their marriage of convenience will not interfere with each other's lives.
But it does interfere with their lives, as Sherry soon learns. Hero is not "up to snuff" on the social niceties of a lady of fashion, and Sherry is always getting her out of some scrape or another. Though she never means to cause trouble, her charming innocence often leads her to trust people she shouldn't. And Sherry's own harum-scarum habits as a young blood and would-be gamester do not set Hero a good example. Over the course of the story, Sherry's friends Gil, Ferdy, and George begin to see the marriage for what it is, and sympathize greatly with Hero's unrequited love. When events conspire to separate the Viscount and his wife, their friends engage in a well-meaning little plot to open the Viscount's eyes to what he has in Hero.
Hero seems a strange name for our leading lady, but Heyer writes a scene in which she explains that it comes from Shakespeare (Much Ado About Nothing). It's one of the funnier scenes of the story, with the characters hurriedly disclaiming all knowledge of Shakespeare for fear of being thought that horrid thing, "bookish." It reminded me a little of P. G. Wodehouse's characters and their hilariously vague or derogatory allusions to great literature.
The characters are really wonderful and their interactions with each other are funny but not farcical. George Wrotham is one of my favorites, a dashing and romantic young lord who always has his hair artistically rumpled with one piece hanging over his perfect forehead. He is forever trying to call people out to fight duels, but he's so good with a pistol that no one will go out with him. He is a devoted admirer of The Incomparable, but his mortgaged estates do not recommend his suit. This allows for much angst as he dramatically claims at least three times in the story that he wants to blow his brains out over Isabella's coolness.
I also loved Gil Ringwood, Sherry's intelligent friend, and his cousin Ferdy Fakenham (who is not very intelligent but who certainly dresses in the height of fashion!). And of course Sherry himself is so much fun to watch, moving from a thoughtless, selfish immaturity to a more responsible mindset. Isabella Milborne is also quite well-written; I enjoyed all the rationale behind the coy actions of an incomparable beauty. Lady Saltash is another wonderful lady, and I loved her worldly-wise little comments on the developing story. I instantly pictured her as Barbara Leigh-Hunt, the actress who plays Lady Catherine de Bourgh in the 1995 Pride and Prejudice and Lady Cumnor in the 1999 Wives and Daughters.
And who can forget Jason, Sherry's pickpocket of a tiger! I'm not perfectly sure of the definition, but I believe a "tiger" is a nobleman's assistant coachman or some such thing. Sherry met Jason when the latter tried to pick his pockets, and was impressed with the boy's gift with horses. Jason adores his master with an almost religious devotion. The only problem is that Jason can't quite curb his old habits of thievery. But Sherry's friends know that all they have to do is apply to Sherry to make Jason cough up all the stolen property. Too funny!
Heyer's delightful use of the slang of the times has me wanting to incorporate those words into my own vocabulary. It gives the characters such an authentic feel, to have them constantly saying that they shall "deal extremely" (get along well) and that this situation is "beyond anything" (quite shocking) and that so-and-so is "disguised" (drunk). I also love Heyer's attention to the details of what they are wearing. It's quite fascinating and her descriptions conjure up fantastic images of high fashion and breathtaking artistry. I'm not a costumer myself, but the costumers I know would love these descriptions!
So far my experiences with Heyer's books have both been audiobooks (the other I have heard is Cotillion, read by Phyllida Nash). I loved Eve Matheson's reading of this story. She does the various voices extremely well, and her accents are wonderful (Jason's slangy Cockney especially comes to mind). It constantly amazed me how Matheson is able to switch from Hero's soft, sweet voice to Sherry's louder, rougher tones, but she accomplishes this feat admirably in all the dialogue. You can tell that Matheson is fully alive to the wonderful sarcasm of certain narrative descriptions — but it's not all just a laugh. The more serious moments are sensitively handled, and I couldn't believe how much I cared for the characters by the time the story was over.
The only caution I would give to younger readers is that the book does contain a fair amount of mild swearing (all those young bloods don't say "darn," you know!) and there are a few instances in which mistresses, seduction, and "bits of muslin" are discussed.
I can't recommend this story enough, and I'm very thankful to my fellow LibraryThinger ChocolateMuse for suggesting this as my second Heyer book. I'm also very much indebted to my library for coming through with a long-shot interlibrary loan. This title certainly delivered! Now, if only someone would adapt this as a mini-series...
Heyer's characters are wonderful; Sherry's friends - Gil, Ferdy, and George - are fantastically drawn and the life of the novel. The best scenes in the book are the ones that display the dynamic between these four men. Though they initially seem like an identical group of rakes, they are actually very different in personality, and their antics are hilarious. Though [Friday's Child] is set in the time of Jane Austen, and deals with the same type of "comedy of manners," the real difference comes in Heyer's ability to write about this masculine world. Austen is very female-focused, and while she wrote extensively about the private lives of women, her reader is not privy to the home lives of her male characters - we do not see Darcy and Bingely drinking port and discussing Elizabeth and Jane. Heyer's readers are, however, able to see and hear exactly what her male characters are thinking. We enter their breakfast rooms and gaming halls just as often as we enter Hero's and Isabella's drawing-rooms. I enjoyed seeing the other side of this society, and look forward to reading more of Heyer's works.
Hero, having been raised simply in the country does not know all the fine details of manoeuvring through polite society. With no one to guide her, she makes plenty of missteps along the way. Lord Anthony, instead of helping her, often either laughs at her follies or scolds her. Eventually she makes a mistake that he can’t excuse and she decides the best solution is to run away.
How these two young people overcome all obstacles, including their own rather silly and at times, selfish natures made for a very clever and intriguing story. These two had a lot of growing up to do, as they both tend to be impulsive and between them possess only about half a brain. They are however charming and very likeable and you can’t help but root for them.
As always with Georgette Heyer, her eye to detail is spot on whether she is describing the fashionable clothes, furnishings or food of the day. I truly think her best work is in the dialogue, she uses the popular phrasing from that time and some very clever and amusing tidbits are sprinkled throughout. I thoroughly enjoyed this light comedy of errors.
So…she sat there in the back of my head until I found that Sourcebooks began reprinting her titles! Oh, Joy! Oh, Joy! I took a step and bought Friday’s Child, intending to give her a shot. And can I say that I just loved it?!?! Seriously, the humor and wit that ran throughout the books was utterly delightful to me! I love reading regencies to relax. They are great “take me back in time” stories that I fall in a spell with each time I read one. Friday’s Child was no exception. Heyer was able to keep the plot rolling and rolling. Actually, I thought she could have ended the story several times before she did, but nonetheless…was happy to keep the characters with me til the end!
If you enjoy regencies…then I highly recommend Georgette Heyer if you’ve never tried her before.
This is just as delightful as any Georgette Heyer I've read. I particularly liked seeing Sherry's character development -- unusual, in the hero of a Regency romance. If you haven't read any Georgette Heyer and are interested in giving her a try, this would be a pleasant place to start.
Lake Placid, September 6, 1963
Dear Mrs. Heyer,
On behalf of hundreds of political women
In 1948, a year before my arrest, I had read -- and revelled in --FRIDAY'S CHILD, and as I have a very retentive memory I was able to tell it to my cell-mates, practically verbatim. At first it was very difficult, because I had to translate as I went along and didn't want them to lose one of the quips and Ferdy-isms which are so much part of it. With time I acquired skill and in this way Hero (Kitten), Sherry, Gil, Isabella became our close and much-loved friends who were often asked to visit us and received a warm welcome and aroused hearty - but hushed - laughter. Truly, your characters managed to awaken smiles, even when hearts were heavy, stomach empty and the future dark indeed!
You probably don't know that life in a Rumanian political prison is particularly harsh. Political prisoners are strictly forbidden:
a) all communication with their families, lawyers, etc,
b) books, newspapers, magazines,
c) writing materials of any kind,
d) transistors, etc.
During the 12 years I spent in prison I didn't see a written page. My memory however, could not be sealed up and thanks to it and to you, my fellow-sufferers begged, again and again, to hear "What Kitten Did Next".
I decided then, if I ever came out of prison and from behind the Iron Curtain, to write and thank you most gratefully for this "jewel of the past and present" and wish you to remember than although I am no longer there, your jewel is still helping those that carry on their weary load of prison years.
With warmest regards,
Sincerely,
(signed)
(Miss) Nora SAMUELLI
Another re-release from Georgette Heyer that was first published in 1944, “Friday’s Child” seemed to answer a public outcry for more light-hearted regency fair. As Ms Heyer herself wrote about this novel, “I think myself I ought to be shot for writing such
This was written during a time of deprivation and war in London and Ms Heyer’s fans were looking for a way to escape from their tense situation. The humor and comedic banter in her novels provided them a way to retreat (at least mentally) to a happier place and enjoy the antics and bumble broths of her well-written characters.
Friday’s Child is the story of Sherry, Lord Sherington, and Kitten, Hero Wantage, who marry at what seems to be the drop of a hat. Sherry needs a wife to gain control of his inheritance. The orphaned Hero needs someone to help her or she’s about to be sent off by her cousins to work as a governess. Since Sherry’s first choice refuses him, when he happens along and sees Kitten so down-hearted, he coerces the story out of her and then decides if he must be married, might as well be to Kitten! As she is not yet ‘of age’, they elope to London.
Both characters are really not mature enough to manage themselves, much less marry; but as this will solve both their problems, onward they go. This is only the beginning of chapters of mayhem, scrapes, and misadventures. With each problem revealed and eventually solved, the reader watches these two grow up and learn to recognize and accept responsibility. They say the devil is in the details and so it is with Ms Heyer’s novel. Her detailed descriptions and dialogue evoke the regency period with all its attendant restrictions and limits. The secondary cast will leave you in stitches as each tries to help or hinder the couple as appropriate for their motives.
This is an enjoyable, G-rated novel as there are only a handful of passionate kisses towards the end of the novel; so this would be appropriate for any age reader. It would, I think, be difficult to read this book without a smile on your face. The antics of the happy couple and their supporters and detractors seem delightfully silly compared with most romance fare today. If you are in need of a few hours of escape, I heartily recommend “Friday’s Child” by Georgette Heyer.
This particular romance concerns young Lord Sherringham, known as Sherry, who proposes to Isabella, known as the Incomparable, and is refused. Irritated by this and determined to marry so he can come into his substantial inheritance, Sherry vows to marry the first woman he sees. Hero
Hero, dubbed Kitten by her new husband, becomes a favorite of his group of friends and embarks on life in Society with a vengeance, buying clothes and furnishings, seeing the sights, going to parties, and having a brief but expensive flirtation with gambling. Sherry realizes his young bride has had no preparation for the life she's now leading, and he often finds himself pulling her out of scrapes, warning her away from undesirable companions, and explaining, with exasperation, why she should not have listened to words he himself carelessly uttered in her presence.
When he castigates her for another shocking escapade (she was planning a public carriage race against another lady) and threatens to send her to his unsympathetic mother for training, Hero runs to his friends for help, and they obligingly hide her with the grandmother of one of them in Bath. Sherry's friends realize that Sherry cares for her more than he himself has realized and figure that missing her will give him a chance to know his own heart.
Further adventures ensue and another star-crossed set of lovers must work out their misunderstandings before all comes right in the end . . . of course.
An engaging read, Friday's Child has been compared unfavorably to Heyer's earlier novel, The Convenient Marriage, which also features the story of a very young heroine and her unexpected marriage. While I agree that the characters of Sherry and "Kitten" - the one so immature, the other so passive - leave something to be desired, I cannot help but feel that to compare them to Rule and Horry (of The Convenient Marriage) is to miss the point. This is a tale of growing up and realizing where one's heart lies, and it is hard to imagine how Heyer could have told her story if Sherry had been as sophisticated and knowing as Lord Rule.
That said, I am in agreement that The Convenient Marriage is the more enjoyable novel, and Rule the more desirable hero. I imagine this says quite as much about my own requirements in a romance as it does about Heyer's work...
tbc