The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics)

by Umberto Eco

Paperback, 1991

Status

Available

Call number

801.95

Publication

Indiana University Press (1991), Paperback, 304 pages

Description

Eco's essays read like letters from a friend, trying to share something he loves with someone he likes.... Read this brilliant, enjoyable, and possibly revolutionary book." --George J. Leonard, San Francisco Review of Books ... a wealth of insight and instruction." --J. O. Tate, National Review If anyone can make [semiotics] clear, it's Professor Eco.... Professor Eco's theme deserves respect; language should be used to communicate more easily without literary border guards." --The New York Times The limits of interpretation mark the limits of our world. Umberto Eco's new collection of essays touches deftly on such matters." --Times Literary Supplement It is a careful and challenging collection of essays that broach topics rarely considered with any seriousness by literary theorists." --Diacritics Umberto Eco focuses here on what he once called "the cancer of uncontrolled interpretation"--that is, the belief that many interpreters have gone too far in their domination of texts, thereby destroying meaning and the basis for communication.… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member KirkLowery
This book is a collection of 15 essays grouped around the subject: "Is there any limitation to how a reader may interpret a text?" Eco's answer is "yes." If nothing else, one may find -- not always easily! -- what the text may NOT mean. Some of the articles are an easy read, for Eco is an
Show More
entertaining essayist. Some of them deal with technical discussions of semiotic processes and issues in the philosophy of language. A background in linguistics, history of Western philosophy and civilization in general will provide a useful context to what he says. Don't think Eco stands with Hirsch that the author/speaker rules the interpretation of a speech act. But he does not take the deconstructionist path of the absolute freedom of the reader. He speaks of the "protected meaning" of a text, which, at the minimum, is what the text *cannot* mean. I particularly recommend the chapter "Portrait of the Elder as a Young Pliny" to represent the best results of Eco's ideas of interpretation.
Show Less
LibraryThing member mmodine
Semiotics is a dense area of philosophy, but Eco’s readability makes it somewhat more manageable. I’ve read a few of his books, both novels and essay collections, and I wonder why he hasn’t gained much footing over against the giants of deconstruction—most of whom, incidentally, would hate
Show More
the notion of their being considered giants of anything.

I especially appreciate the idea that, while the best interpretation of a given work cannot be identified, it is a simple(!) matter to demonstrate which are bad. But, as Eco says in the great epilogue to his great novel The Name of the Rose, this is a matter for readers to determine, text in hand—the author is deliberately excluded. Eco may this be a helpful corrective to those who, having little understood what, say, Jacques Derrida or Roland Barthes mean with the ascendancy of the reader in interpretation, incorrectly believe that, say, alternative facts are a thing that exist over against alternative interpretations of facts. I haven’t said this well.
Show Less

Awards

René Wellek Prize (Winner — 1992)

Physical description

304 p.

ISBN

0253208696 / 9780253208699

Similar in this library

Page: 0.5949 seconds