Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths

Book, 1969

Status

Available

Call number

616.07

Collection

Publication

Publisher Unknown (1969)

Description

As elected coroners came to be replaced by medical examiners with scientific training, the American public became fascinated with their work. From the grisly investigations showcased on highly rated television shows like C.S.I. to the bestselling mysteries that revolve around forensic science, medical examiners have never been so visible-or compelling. They, and they alone, solve the riddle of suspicious death and the existential questions that come with it. Why did someone die? Could it have been prevented? Should someone be held accountable? What are the implications of ruling a death a suicide, a homicide, or an accident? Can medical examiners unmask the perfect crime? Postmortem goes deep inside the world of medical examiners to uncover the intricate web of pathological, social, legal, and moral issues in which they operate. Stefan Timmermans spent years in a medical examiner's office, following cases, interviewing examiners, and watching autopsies. While he relates fascinating cases here, he is also more broadly interested in the cultural authority and responsibilities that come with being a medical examiner. Although these professionals attempt to remain objective, medical examiners are nonetheless responsible for evaluating subtle human intentions. Consequently, they may end-or start-criminal investigations, issue public health alerts, and even cause financial gain or harm to survivors. How medical examiners speak to the living on behalf of the dead, is Timmermans's subject, revealed here in the day-to-day lives of the examiners themselves.… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member jen.e.moore
This is an academic ethnography of medical examiners, looking into how they interpret evidence, how they construct their authority, and the challenges they face as medicine and the legal system change. It's written about as compellingly as the usual ethnography, which means I only fell asleep
Show More
reading it twice. But there are some interesting tidbits in here for people with practice slogging through academic prose.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Sandra_Berglund
I was disappointed because it only detailed ONE autopsy, and not one single picture. Though well-researched and well-written, it was not what I expected. My studies included watching autopsies at the County Coroner's of the Sheriff's dept. and I can definitely agree on a certain comment Mr.
Show More
Timmermans made: page 54, " . . . forensic pathologists . . . anticpate the scientific puzzle to be solved . . . frustration comes from a lack of significant findings."
Show Less

Original publication date

2006
Page: 0.5617 seconds