DDC/MDS
| 364.1/06/609794 |
Publication
New York : Random house, 1967.
Original publication date
1966
Description
Hell's Angels" was Hunter Thompson's first book, an account of the year that the reporter spent riding with the biker gang, then the very symbol of dangerous counterculture. After writing a piece on the Heirs Angels and other cycle gangs for The Nation, Thompson signed a contract with Ballantine and spent time with "as many vicious thugs as possible." His involvement ended on Labor Day 1966 when a group of Angels "stomped" Thompson, nearly kicking him to death. "Far from being freaks, the Hell's Angels are a logical product of the culture that now claims to be shocked by their existence. The generation represented by the editors of Time has lived so long in a world full of celluloid outlaws hustling toothpaste and hair oil that it is no longer capable of confronting the real thing. For twenty years they have sat with their children and watched yesterday's outlaws raise hell with yesterday's world...and now they are bringing up children who think Jesse James is a television character." "California, Labor Day weekend . . . early, with ocean fog still in the streets, outlaw motorcyclists wearing chains, shades and greasy Levis roll out from damp garages, all-night diners and cast-off one-night pads in Frisco, Hollywood, Berdoo and East Oakland, heading for the Monterey peninsula, north of Big Sur. . . The Menace is loose again." Thus begins Hunter S. Thompson's vivid account of his experiences with California's most no-torious motorcycle gang, the Hell's Angels. In the mid-1960s, Thompson spent almost two years living with the controversial An-gels, cycling up and down the coast, reveling in the anarchic spirit of their clan, and, as befits their name, raising hell. His book successfully captures a singular moment in American history, when the biker lifestyle was first defined, and when such countercultural movements were electrifying and horrifying America. Thompson, the creator of Gonzo journalism, writes with his usual bravado, energy, and brutal honesty, and with a nuanced and incisive eye; as The New Yorker pointed out, "For all its uninhibited and sardonic humor, Thompson's book is a thoughtful piece of work." As illuminating now as when originally published in 1967, Hell's Angels is a gripping portrait, and the best account we have of the truth behind an American legend.… (more)
Status
Available
Call number
Collection
User reviews
LibraryThing member ebenlindsey
Interesting to read a pre-gonzo Hunter Thompson. Hells Angels is still "New Journalism", but unlike later works, the text is well edited and well crafted. The book chronicles the California Hells Angels in 1966-1967, a period in which they were plucked from obscurity and became a media sensation
Show More
after several high profile run-ins with the law. He shows how this media attention first revitalized their membership, and then threatened to destroy them. Thompson traces their history and roots back to the disenfranchised children of dust-bowl okies and a segment of World War II veterans who had no skills in the new economy that was emerging in the fifties and sixties. A very engaging read. Show Less
LibraryThing member dandelionroots
Elated to discover that Thompson was rather prolific - a whole career of musings and observations to devour! And so many intriguing literary references to track down. Fraternizing with the Angels whilst their popularity/notoriety dramatically increased, he... eloquently calls the
"There is an important difference between the words 'loser' and 'outlaw'. One is passive and the other is active, and the main reasons the Angels are such good copy is that they are acting out the day-dreams of millions of losers who don't wear any defiant insignia and who don't know how to be outlaws. The streets of every city are thronged with men who would pay all the money they could get their hands on to be transformed - even for a day - into hairy, hard-fisted brutes who walk over cops, extort free drinks from terrified bartenders and thunder out of town on big motorcycles after raping the banker's daughter. Even people who think the Angels should all be put to sleep find it easy to identify with them. They command a fascination, however reluctant, that borders on psychic masturbation."
Anyone got a motorcycle I can borrow? His description of riding is still giving me cravings.
Show More
media/police/politicians out on their rampant bullshit while refraining from romanticizing the dregs of society/humanity that make up Hell's Angels. Motorcycle clubs were on the verge of extinction before the general public became entranced following a widely publicized distortion of a run - he's conscious throughout of their simultaneous fascination and revulsion. Sooooooo goooooood."There is an important difference between the words 'loser' and 'outlaw'. One is passive and the other is active, and the main reasons the Angels are such good copy is that they are acting out the day-dreams of millions of losers who don't wear any defiant insignia and who don't know how to be outlaws. The streets of every city are thronged with men who would pay all the money they could get their hands on to be transformed - even for a day - into hairy, hard-fisted brutes who walk over cops, extort free drinks from terrified bartenders and thunder out of town on big motorcycles after raping the banker's daughter. Even people who think the Angels should all be put to sleep find it easy to identify with them. They command a fascination, however reluctant, that borders on psychic masturbation."
Anyone got a motorcycle I can borrow? His description of riding is still giving me cravings.
Show Less
LibraryThing member flexatone
Terrific proto-gonzo with a Grizzly-man style ending. It's a bit of a slow burn, but I don't mind. The occasional weird reference hits you from left field and makes your mind fuzzy. It's a fun read, and at this point, it's even a bit of American history.
LibraryThing member rivkat
Thompson's writing is not aging well; he thinks the Hell’s Angels are pathetic and have been made that way by the lack of room in America for anything but a certain square path to acceptable masculinity. But his empathy extends only so far. (Here there’s a lot of rape.) The narrative begins
Show More
with the Hell’s Angels’ rise to national prominence when two gang rapes were reported at a meetup. Thompson then tells us that one victim was African-American and another was a pregnant white girl, both of which apparently mean that they didn’t get raped. And later, he explains that the charges were dropped, and that they probably consented to the first few men and then freaked out, which both also apparently mean that there was no rape. Later, he asserts that all women secretly are at least curious about what it would be like to be raped, and that it’s easy to convict a man for rape of a lower-class woman because she’s not ashamed to reveal the crime the way an upper-class woman is. Then he says that, though he didn’t see any rapes at his Hell’s Angels hangouts, he did see disturbing behavior, such as multiple men having sex with a woman who was too drunk to stand up. Women also appear in a few other roles, such as his hoity-toity neighbor who was scared by the presence of multiple Hell’s Angels in his apartment/on the sidewalk at all hours, which was silly of her because the one time his guests shot out the windows of his apartment (1) that wasn’t the Hell’s Angels and (2) they didn’t hit anything. Show Less
LibraryThing member banshea
This is probably one of my favorite non-fiction books ever. It chronicles the media's role in the creation of the Hell's Angels -- the infamous biker gang that was on its way to extinction until press agencies and politicians began blaming them for society's ills, creating a more effective
Show More
recruiting campaign than any gang had experienced before. Thompson goes on to describe his own personal experiences riding and partying with the Angels, as well as the currents that abruptly ended his relationship with them. The book is sociological, showing the influence of the press and painting a portrait of the Angels that is probably one of the most sympathetic from the time, as Thompson was one of the few journalists who allowed the Angels to critique his work. Thompson's writing style makes the book accessible to a wide audience and easy to read despite the density of insight and information. At the time of writing he had not perfected his famous gonzo style, which makes the book easier to follow than, for example, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Show Less
LibraryThing member DMCrimson
It's a shame that most people associated Hunter Thompson with "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas", as "Hell's Angels" is a vastly superior book in every way. Whereas "Fear..." was a failed attempt at Gonzo journalism, this book is an unqualified success. Thompson goes to great lengths to show the true
Show More
nature of the bikers, and how their behavior compares to American values. This is a beautiful story, and I highly recommend it as a way to get into Hunter's writings. Show Less
LibraryThing member poetontheone
A fascinating glimpse at the most infamous motorcycle gang in history. Hunter Thompson weaves the tale as only he can. A perspective on the group you won't get from they themselves, those who extol them, or those who loathe them. Uniquely original. Some of Thompson's best work.
LibraryThing member ellevee
Thompson's first book still stands as one of the most original and exciting pieces of journalism written in the last century. (Then again, everything he ever wrote is great, as far as I'm concerned.)
While lacking the frenetic, trademark Gonzo style of his later works, this is still an amazing look
While lacking the frenetic, trademark Gonzo style of his later works, this is still an amazing look
Show More
at one of the truly outsider cultures of our society. Show Less
LibraryThing member mybooksmylove
My Rating: A+
My Review:
This book is a great study of a sometimes mystifying and often intriguing group of people Hunter S. Thompson does not romanticize the Hell's Angels, nor does he portray them as anything other than what they are. He does however, write in a way that keeps you begging for more.
The only issue I had with this book was really my issue more than the authors. The titles of the three sections seemed a bit misleading, but other than that this was a wonderful book. I highly recommend it to those even a little bit interested in the Hell's Angels or even Mr. Thompson himself.
My Review:
This book is a great study of a sometimes mystifying and often intriguing group of people Hunter S. Thompson does not romanticize the Hell's Angels, nor does he portray them as anything other than what they are. He does however, write in a way that keeps you begging for more.
Show More
he paints a vivid picture, which proves his talents to me mostly because I have nothing to draw from when it comes to this time period except for re-runs on Nick-at-Night.The only issue I had with this book was really my issue more than the authors. The titles of the three sections seemed a bit misleading, but other than that this was a wonderful book. I highly recommend it to those even a little bit interested in the Hell's Angels or even Mr. Thompson himself.
Show Less
LibraryThing member JosephJ
I read this when I was heavy into my HST stage and it was a good book. Still is, just not all that intriguing. Some of the stories, especially those about the biker runs he'd go on where it was like week long benders with these insane bikers were worthwhile.
It dragged on at parts, but overall was
It dragged on at parts, but overall was
Show More
still entertaining. Show Less
LibraryThing member rebbyanne
Very interesting and gives readers a glimpse into the sentiments of Hunter S. Thompson that fueled his desire and creation of Gonzo journalism. He very articulately chronicles the inability of the media to responsibly report on the Hell's Angels. In certain instances, it is obvious that his
Show More
repulsion for the blatant lies by the media and government officials marks the beginning of the creation of Gonzo journalism that lies in the future (such as on pages 224-225). He is only embellishing was has already been embellished. Show Less
LibraryThing member Matt_Sessions
A comprehensive, breezily-told account of the outlaw motorcycle gang. Thompson remains as objective as possible, balancing hard statistical facts, recorded interviews and anecdotes, and sociological theory. These three elements are held together by direct, light prose, conveyed in Thompson's
Show More
distinctive tone. There are overriding themes but this seems to be a work without a firm thesis statement -- beyond perhaps the simple "The Hell's Angels exist." Even so, this is an excellent book -- quick, informative, and entertaining. Show Less
LibraryThing member csweder
There were two things that struck me the most while reading this book.
The first is in regards to Hunter Thompson, and his other books that I've read. I think, somehow, I am reading his books in reverse order than I should. The first Thompson book I read was Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (which I
The second thing that stood out to me was in regards to Pledged, a book that was set to 'uncover' the secrets of sororities. Over and over again, I couldn't help but notice how much more flattering Thompson's depiction of Hell's Angels--who by all means are dirty, drink a lot, fight a lot, and have no problems taking down whoever gets in their way--as much more favorable that binge-drinking sorority girls. Reading this book, I feel that the author of Pledged was attempting to do what Thompson succeeded in doing: investigating and reporting truthfully upon a fraternal organization. Not all of Thompson's comments were favorable to the Angels, but neither did he make them out to be the plague on humanity than the Pledged author did. (Can't remember her name, and she is so not worth my time to look it up...)
Overall, the topic was interesting, and Thompson's writing was entertaining, but I feel as if he stretched it farther than it should have been. By pae 180, I felt as if I knew everything I needed...but the book kept going another 80 pages where I didn't feel like I learned much new information. I can only read about fights and mamas and drinking so long before I'm over it. But in general a worthwhile read.
The first is in regards to Hunter Thompson, and his other books that I've read. I think, somehow, I am reading his books in reverse order than I should. The first Thompson book I read was Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (which I
Show More
mostly read because the movie made of it had my lovely Johnny Depp). After reading that book, I was astonished by his abilities to take as many drugs, and drink as much alcohol as his did...and still live. I came away baffled. Then I read The Rum Diaries--which I think happened before his (in)famous Vegas trip, and really is a tale of how much of an alcoholic he was. (Fun book though.) Now, reading his account of the Hell's Angels, I can see that yes, the rumors are true, he WAS a journalist (not just a lush). It's like stepping back in time--I can see his journalistic qualities, and therefore read his writings in a whole new light. Of course in this book, he does win the affection of the Angels by drinking a lot, but focus of the book is investigating something else, not his own lurid tales and adventures. The second thing that stood out to me was in regards to Pledged, a book that was set to 'uncover' the secrets of sororities. Over and over again, I couldn't help but notice how much more flattering Thompson's depiction of Hell's Angels--who by all means are dirty, drink a lot, fight a lot, and have no problems taking down whoever gets in their way--as much more favorable that binge-drinking sorority girls. Reading this book, I feel that the author of Pledged was attempting to do what Thompson succeeded in doing: investigating and reporting truthfully upon a fraternal organization. Not all of Thompson's comments were favorable to the Angels, but neither did he make them out to be the plague on humanity than the Pledged author did. (Can't remember her name, and she is so not worth my time to look it up...)
Overall, the topic was interesting, and Thompson's writing was entertaining, but I feel as if he stretched it farther than it should have been. By pae 180, I felt as if I knew everything I needed...but the book kept going another 80 pages where I didn't feel like I learned much new information. I can only read about fights and mamas and drinking so long before I'm over it. But in general a worthwhile read.
Show Less
LibraryThing member DinadansFriend
This is the first long non-fiction piece by Hunter S. Thompson, the gonzo genius of American journalism. It was written and published from such a different world than the 1960's that it might be from a different mind altogether. But it is a good book about the evolution of a group of hobby cyclists
Show More
into a collection of divergent personalities demonstrating a penchant for very anti-social behaviour. It's worth the read, even if the narrator may not have been exactly as he describes himself in the book. Show Less
LibraryThing member emed0s
This one reads as a long, painfully long, regular newspaper article. Not at all like the imaginative and fluid text on Fear&Loathing or The Kentucky Derby. So be advised.
LibraryThing member edwinbcn
The Penguin Modern Classics series publishes Hunter S. Thompson's first novel simply as Hell's Angels, a much shorter version of the novel, aka Hell's Angels: The Strange and Terrible Saga of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs. It is a non-fiction novel about the legendary band of motor riders, known as
In 1966, the year Hell's Angels was published, the genre of the non-fiction novel was brand new. The genre came into existence during the preceding decade, while Truman Capote's novel In Cold Blood, published in 1965, is its most well-known example. With Hell's Angels Hunter S. Thompson is identified as having initiated the genre of Gonzo journalism, i.e. the style of news reporting that allows for fictional elements, without the attempt of objectivity.
1965/66 was not the time the Hells Angels emerged, but it was a moment the club achieved notoriety. In fact, at that time, the Hells Angels were not the only organized band, that was characterized by a sub-culture and cult of violence. However, the Hells Angels, through their high degree of organization, and the luck of having been led by a number of smart people, and their ability to tie in with contemporary Beat-culture, outlasted most of the other gangs and clubs.
In Hell's Angels Thompson sketches a very accurate portrait of the Hells Angels, their lifestyle and their cult. It is probably the most readable sociological introduction to the phenomenon. To obtain first-hand experience and knowledge of the Hell's Angels, Hunter S. Thompson joined their ranks. Thus, he was able to experience their culture very close-up. In Hell's Angels he describes many of the Club's typical elements, but also provides detailed explanations about their membership, and less savory details, such as the Angels habit to wear the same outfit without ever changing it, as it stiffens into a harness from dirt, piss and vomit, not even necessarily all their own.
A weakness of the book is seemingly that despite the fact that Thompson joined the angels, the book is heavily reliant on newspaper reports, and, since the book describes a very short period, it is thereby also very repetitive. The author is barely able to hold the reader's attention, as the full-length book becomes a bit tiresome, and a shorter version would possible be much more powerful.
Nonetheless, Hell's Angels makes for excellent reading, and forms a remarkable piece of sociological writing on the side-lines of Beat culture in the mid-1960s.
Show More
the Hell's Angels.In 1966, the year Hell's Angels was published, the genre of the non-fiction novel was brand new. The genre came into existence during the preceding decade, while Truman Capote's novel In Cold Blood, published in 1965, is its most well-known example. With Hell's Angels Hunter S. Thompson is identified as having initiated the genre of Gonzo journalism, i.e. the style of news reporting that allows for fictional elements, without the attempt of objectivity.
1965/66 was not the time the Hells Angels emerged, but it was a moment the club achieved notoriety. In fact, at that time, the Hells Angels were not the only organized band, that was characterized by a sub-culture and cult of violence. However, the Hells Angels, through their high degree of organization, and the luck of having been led by a number of smart people, and their ability to tie in with contemporary Beat-culture, outlasted most of the other gangs and clubs.
In Hell's Angels Thompson sketches a very accurate portrait of the Hells Angels, their lifestyle and their cult. It is probably the most readable sociological introduction to the phenomenon. To obtain first-hand experience and knowledge of the Hell's Angels, Hunter S. Thompson joined their ranks. Thus, he was able to experience their culture very close-up. In Hell's Angels he describes many of the Club's typical elements, but also provides detailed explanations about their membership, and less savory details, such as the Angels habit to wear the same outfit without ever changing it, as it stiffens into a harness from dirt, piss and vomit, not even necessarily all their own.
A weakness of the book is seemingly that despite the fact that Thompson joined the angels, the book is heavily reliant on newspaper reports, and, since the book describes a very short period, it is thereby also very repetitive. The author is barely able to hold the reader's attention, as the full-length book becomes a bit tiresome, and a shorter version would possible be much more powerful.
Nonetheless, Hell's Angels makes for excellent reading, and forms a remarkable piece of sociological writing on the side-lines of Beat culture in the mid-1960s.
Show Less
LibraryThing member kukulaj
A fascinating book for many reasons.
It's an early and tamer Hunter Thompson. There are glimpses of gonzo journalism, but it is just budding.
It's a nice document of the birth of the Hell's Angels as a national phenomenon. Wasn't it at Altamont where the Rolling Stones hired the Hell's Angels for
Thompson covers quite a few facets of the Hell's Angels phenomenon: sex, drugs, motorcycles, etc.
He characterizes the difference between.. the word hippy does not appear here - it must not have been current in 1966. But sex, drugs, and shaggy hair were certainly common features of hippies and Hell's Angels. Thompson explains: hippies were fighting the past, Angels were fighting the future. They were both fighting the present.
Someplace I read about this book as a foreshadowing of the Trump phenomenon. After reading the book, that still seems on target. I watched a video interview with Andrew Yang, a Democratic candidate for President in the 2020 election. Yang spent a lot of time talking about how robots have displaced many jobs and will displace a lot more in the coming decade. Thompson says that Angels have jobs that will soon be performed by machines.
This book is a nice historical document, a colorful snapshot of a moment in history.
It's an early and tamer Hunter Thompson. There are glimpses of gonzo journalism, but it is just budding.
It's a nice document of the birth of the Hell's Angels as a national phenomenon. Wasn't it at Altamont where the Rolling Stones hired the Hell's Angels for
Show More
security and like somebody got killed? I forget the details. It'd be fascinating to see the those later chapters of the story Thompson tells here.Thompson covers quite a few facets of the Hell's Angels phenomenon: sex, drugs, motorcycles, etc.
He characterizes the difference between.. the word hippy does not appear here - it must not have been current in 1966. But sex, drugs, and shaggy hair were certainly common features of hippies and Hell's Angels. Thompson explains: hippies were fighting the past, Angels were fighting the future. They were both fighting the present.
Someplace I read about this book as a foreshadowing of the Trump phenomenon. After reading the book, that still seems on target. I watched a video interview with Andrew Yang, a Democratic candidate for President in the 2020 election. Yang spent a lot of time talking about how robots have displaced many jobs and will displace a lot more in the coming decade. Thompson says that Angels have jobs that will soon be performed by machines.
This book is a nice historical document, a colorful snapshot of a moment in history.
Show Less
LibraryThing member HenriMoreaux
The impression I get from reading this is that Thompson was quite happy to find excuses and rationalise the violence, rape, gang rape, racism and criminality of the Hell's Angels until such time as they beat the crap out of him over an unidentifiable slight. At which point he suddenly was able to
Frankly this book didn't do much for me and I found the way in which Thompson said being gang raped was the girls fault at Monterey for having gone to the beach was pretty appalling, even if they were consenting to one or even two blokes, that's not a green light for twenty by any means.
It was interesting in so much as it was a glimpse into 1960 motorcycle culture, yet every observation is tainted through Thompson's fanboyish rose coloured glasses.
Show More
identify they were going no where fast, the lifestyle was in no way glamorous and very much a dead end leaving people if not dead, then for dead, with one example being a person having a mouthful of rotten teeth but no money for a dentist. Suddenly the freewheeling lifestyle isn't so great when you have no money to fix your teeth.Frankly this book didn't do much for me and I found the way in which Thompson said being gang raped was the girls fault at Monterey for having gone to the beach was pretty appalling, even if they were consenting to one or even two blokes, that's not a green light for twenty by any means.
It was interesting in so much as it was a glimpse into 1960 motorcycle culture, yet every observation is tainted through Thompson's fanboyish rose coloured glasses.
Show Less
LibraryThing member DanielSTJ
This was, through and through, a great piece of writing and an amazing chronicle of non-fiction by Hunter S. Thompson. The writing was vivid, descriptive, electrifying, and insightful and provided entertainment and knowledge on multiple levels- providing an optimal reading experience that resounded
4.75 stars!
Show More
with force and keen insight on the topic that Thompson wrote so expertly about. This is a great book, for American literary enthusiasts and non-fiction admirers alike, and I recommend that all interested read it. You will not waste your time- not one bit.4.75 stars!
Show Less
LibraryThing member Andjhostet
April monthly reading theme for (counter culture/drugs) read #1
Great book, unsurprisingly, from the great Hunter S. Thompson. HTS's Gonzo style of journalism is superb, and beautifully mixes journalistic exposition with evocative and thrilling narrative. It really allows you to get absorbed into
The Hell's Angels have an extremely complex culture and morals. HTS's portrayal of them is extremely interesting, and feels very honest. Very curious to read other sides of it, to see how accurate Thompson was.
Great book, unsurprisingly, from the great Hunter S. Thompson. HTS's Gonzo style of journalism is superb, and beautifully mixes journalistic exposition with evocative and thrilling narrative. It really allows you to get absorbed into
Show More
the scene that HTS is writing about. The Hell's Angels have an extremely complex culture and morals. HTS's portrayal of them is extremely interesting, and feels very honest. Very curious to read other sides of it, to see how accurate Thompson was.
Show Less
LibraryThing member csweder
There were two things that struck me the most while reading this book.
The first is in regards to Hunter Thompson, and his other books that I've read. I think, somehow, I am reading his books in reverse order than I should. The first Thompson book I read was Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (which I
The second thing that stood out to me was in regards to Pledged, a book that was set to 'uncover' the secrets of sororities. Over and over again, I couldn't help but notice how much more flattering Thompson's depiction of Hell's Angels--who by all means are dirty, drink a lot, fight a lot, and have no problems taking down whoever gets in their way--as much more favorable that binge-drinking sorority girls. Reading this book, I feel that the author of Pledged was attempting to do what Thompson succeeded in doing: investigating and reporting truthfully upon a fraternal organization. Not all of Thompson's comments were favorable to the Angels, but neither did he make them out to be the plague on humanity than the Pledged author did. (Can't remember her name, and she is so not worth my time to look it up...)
Overall, the topic was interesting, and Thompson's writing was entertaining, but I feel as if he stretched it farther than it should have been. By pae 180, I felt as if I knew everything I needed...but the book kept going another 80 pages where I didn't feel like I learned much new information. I can only read about fights and mamas and drinking so long before I'm over it. But in general a worthwhile read.
The first is in regards to Hunter Thompson, and his other books that I've read. I think, somehow, I am reading his books in reverse order than I should. The first Thompson book I read was Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (which I
Show More
mostly read because the movie made of it had my lovely Johnny Depp). After reading that book, I was astonished by his abilities to take as many drugs, and drink as much alcohol as his did...and still live. I came away baffled. Then I read The Rum Diaries--which I think happened before his (in)famous Vegas trip, and really is a tale of how much of an alcoholic he was. (Fun book though.) Now, reading his account of the Hell's Angels, I can see that yes, the rumors are true, he WAS a journalist (not just a lush). It's like stepping back in time--I can see his journalistic qualities, and therefore read his writings in a whole new light. Of course in this book, he does win the affection of the Angels by drinking a lot, but focus of the book is investigating something else, not his own lurid tales and adventures. The second thing that stood out to me was in regards to Pledged, a book that was set to 'uncover' the secrets of sororities. Over and over again, I couldn't help but notice how much more flattering Thompson's depiction of Hell's Angels--who by all means are dirty, drink a lot, fight a lot, and have no problems taking down whoever gets in their way--as much more favorable that binge-drinking sorority girls. Reading this book, I feel that the author of Pledged was attempting to do what Thompson succeeded in doing: investigating and reporting truthfully upon a fraternal organization. Not all of Thompson's comments were favorable to the Angels, but neither did he make them out to be the plague on humanity than the Pledged author did. (Can't remember her name, and she is so not worth my time to look it up...)
Overall, the topic was interesting, and Thompson's writing was entertaining, but I feel as if he stretched it farther than it should have been. By pae 180, I felt as if I knew everything I needed...but the book kept going another 80 pages where I didn't feel like I learned much new information. I can only read about fights and mamas and drinking so long before I'm over it. But in general a worthwhile read.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jcbrunner
Hell's Angels is Hunter S. Thomson's entertaining gonzo journalistic take in the mood of the Chicago school of sociology looking at outsider behaviour. Tagging (and partying) along with the Hell's Angels, he notes their acts good and bad. In one chapter, the Angels seem like urban heroes, in the
In contrast to scientific work, he never clarifies his position. He switches between being an insider and an outsider without coming to a clear verdict. He feels both attracted to and repulsed by their strange mix of fascistic brotherhood on wheels.
Show More
next they are thugs. He defends the Angels against public hypocrisy and minimizes their deviant behaviour.Next, he presents the Angels' involvement in brawls, violence, drug-trafficking and rape. At the end of the book, he drifts away from the Angels after having been beaten up.In contrast to scientific work, he never clarifies his position. He switches between being an insider and an outsider without coming to a clear verdict. He feels both attracted to and repulsed by their strange mix of fascistic brotherhood on wheels.
Show Less
LibraryThing member rottweilersmile
interesting enough, and i like what the author ended up doing for writing. funny to see this contrasted now with our clear view of the angels as a drug smuggling group. some of the stuff (particularly on sexual assault) has definitely not aged as well
Subjects
Physical description
278 p.; 22 cm
Local notes
"First printing" stated; a fine copy overall